Geog 258: Maps and GIS


January 6, 2006 (Fri)

Introduction to the map

 

Reading: text p. 2-18


Map is a Model of Reality

 

Example: Shaded Relief Map of North America

Source: National Atlas of United States

 

Let’s compare between the map above and the reality mapped

 

Focus on how topography is *represented* in this map

 

1) The size of map vs. that of topography in North America

2) The dimension of map vs. that of topography in North America (Earth’s surface)

3) The coding scheme of map vs. that of topography in North America

 


What Constitutes Mapness?

 

- Defining Characteristics of Maps -

 

1. Map Scale

 

Map is the reduced version of reality

The scale bar shows the proportion of the map to the environment mapped

 

graphic bar scale

 

Also look at maps in mapquest along different scale. What do you see is changing?

 

What can you infer about the relationship between map symbols and scale?

Symbolization is dependent upon scale

 

Pointer to reading: Chapter 2

 

2. Map Projection

 

Map is the flattened version of spherical earth surface

Map projection means the transformation from 3D to 2D

 

Human beings are not conscious of spherical earth as the geographic scale we can directly experience is confined to very small portion of earth surface

 

 

 

Any change in this transformation as shown above?

We use different spatial reference systems to make sense of the location of features (e.g. from street address, place name, region to latitude & longitude)

 

Pointer to reading: Chapter 1, 3, 4, and 5

3. Map Abstraction

 

Map is the abstracted version of reality

It is necessary to abstract reality to well-accepted coding scheme

Usually cartographic abstraction involves four processes

 

1)   Selection: you can’t show every detail in map, but rather some important detail should be selected (e.g. tourist map should contain leisure activities)

 

Island of Kauai

Source: Old map gallery

 

2)   Classification: some values are classified into a bundle of values  (e.g. per capita income by census tract will be represented with five grading tones instead of the whole range of income value)

Data source: 2000 Census Summary File 3

 

3)   Simplification: symbols need to be simplified depending on scale (e.g. does U.S. map displays the whole detail of land boundaries such as Cape Cod?)

 

 

Image source: www.geocities.com/jqsfamily/postcards/cape.html

 

1)   Symbolization: features should be symbolized properly on the basis of inherent connotation of symbol (e.g. Red China, Blue/Red for political affiliation) or well-accepted standards (e.g. hypsometric tint)

 

New York Downtown’s contribution in fund race 2004

 

Source: Fund Race 2004

 

More on map abstraction next week

 

In technical terms, the shaded relief map is a small-scale map (scale), employs Equal-Area Albers Conic (projection) and elevation is represented with hypsometric tint (abstraction). At the end of this course, you should be able to specify three components of any maps given.

 


“Mapness” Continuum

 

See Figure I.3 in the text (p. 6)

 

Different types of maps lie along a “mapness” continuum (i.e. the degree of closeness to reality or level of abstraction) depending on varying degrees of defining characteristics

 

For example, same phenomenon (e.g. elevation) can be represented differently such as

 

1) Air Photo: it’s just the photo image of earth surface (i.e. less abstraction)

 

2) Orthophotograph: it’s rectified and georeferenced image of earth surface

Southern tip of SUNY-Buffalo North Campus

Source data: NY GIS clearing house - orthophoto

 

3) Topographic map: elevation is represented by contour line (we usually set up some agreement on reading contour line), highway is labeled with shield (i.e. more abstraction)

Source: USGS DRG (Digital Raster Graph)

 

Image map is close to pure reality, topographic map gets farther from reality through map abstraction

 


Map Use vs. Map Making

 

It’s useful to make a distinction between map use and map making.

The figure below shows map use on the left and map making process on the right

 

But there are close relationship between map use and map making

 

Effective use of maps requires understanding of the nature of maps and the mapping process while good map design requires understanding of how the maps will be used. The communications model also serves to emphasize that map use is not simply the reverse of map making but requires a distinct set of skills.

 


Mental Maps

 

Even though maps refer to cartographic maps most of the time, mental maps are noteworthy in our map class, because most of our geographic decision is based on our internalized representation of spatial knowledge (that is mental maps)

 

If you’re having a hard time in visualizing mental maps, imagine what happens in your mind when you try to find the route from home to school or get lost. Yes, you have your own maps of areas (or image of space) in your mind. If you’re asked to construct a map without surveying equipment or knowledge of GIS and mappable data, you probably end up creating mental maps, which is quite unlikely to be fair representation of reality.

 

See Figure I.1 (p. 3)

How many of you wore a smile when you saw this map out of sympathy?

 

Some facts about mental maps

 

Mental maps is personalized view of the world

1)   Mental maps reflect egocentric view of the world (see Figure I.2)

2)   Mental maps lack geometric accuracy of geographic framework

 

Mental maps are formed through firsthand/second experience

3)   Mental maps are formed through direct experience (e.g. wayfinding)

4)   Mental maps can be influenced by indirect experience

a.     It can improve the accuracy of your mental map (e.g. map reading)

b.     It can form the image of some areas you have never been to

 

We use mental maps all the time – when you find the route, when you try to answer “where am I”, when you imagine cities where your friends live

 

Police officer relies on his own mental maps to pinpoint the location of accidents in accident report

 

 

 

Mental maps are important because many geographic decisions are based on mental maps

 

Further discussion on mental maps

 

How mental maps have been used

1) Can be used to design city

 

Kevin Lynch in his book “The Image of the City” used mental maps to find out what makes cities have more comfort level by asking residents directions. Residents or new comers have a hard time answering questions in some urban settings characterized by lack of regular geometry, landmarks and so on.

 

Kevin Lynch claims that urban setting is the composition of nodes, landmarks, paths, and districts. Some cities have higher comfort level because new comers can be more oriented. We can use this information to design cities.

 

 

2) Can be used to understand how human beings acquire spatial knowledge:

 

Reginald Golledge theoriezes that human beings acquire spatial knowledge in the order of landmark (0-dimension, point), route (1-dimension,line, spatial relation) and survey knowledge (2-dimension, area, absolute reference framework). Jumping from landmark/route knowledge to survey knowledge requires indirect experience such as reading cartographic maps.

 

Golledge, R., Dougherty, V. & Bell, S. (1995). Acquiring spatial knowledge: Survey versus route-based knowledge in unfamiliar environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85 (1), 134-158

 

3) Can be used to infer/predict taste or preference

 

Peter Gould surveyed geography students in his class where they want to move to after they graduate. California and South Florida were ranked the highest and Alabama and Mississippi were ranked the lowest. It turns out their preference for cities they want to live is heavily influenced by media (e.g. Hollywood star?) and prior education (e.g. Civil War?). But this study is done almost thirty years ago. What about now?

 


What Makes Maps Popular?

 

1)   Convenience: portable (paper map) and accessible (web map)

2)   Simplicity: you don’t have be overwhelmed by complexity

3)   Credibility: because it seems to be the close representation of the environment

4)   Visual impact: it becomes a tenacious memory

 

These features can be seen as limitations

 

Perversion of reality is inherent in mapping; map is like a frozen food/controlled fiction

Most of maps are static (doesn’t reflect change)

Having a strong visual impression doesn’t mean it’s meaningful

 

In some sense, this course is to make you less tricked by the map

Look beyond the map and confront the world

 


How Maps Are Used?

- Functions of Maps -

 

 

Reference maps: written accounts of the locations of different features

e.g. university district map allows you to identify locations of features and spatial relation between them

Figure I.4

 

Thematic maps: functions like an essay on a particular topic

e.g. housing value map in university district and bus route map in university district allows you to be informed of particular subjects

Figure I.5

 

Navigation maps: maps created specifically to help navigation

Figure I.6

e.g. topographic map, nautical charts, aeronautical charts

 

Persuasive maps: sort of propaganda tools

Figure I.7, I.8, I.9

Further reading: How to lie with maps by Monmonier

 


Different Levels of Map Use

 

See Figure I.11

 

Map reading: understand what map makers portray, and how they are represented

e.g. read Title, legend, scale, map projection, coordinate system, data source, symbol, class interval

 

Map analysis: make measurements and look for spatial patterns

e.g. regional clustering of cancer mortality rate in eastern Kentucky and western West Virginia

 

Map interpretation: explain measurements and spatial patterns

e.g. why regional clustering there?

 


Why study mapping process?

 

Map is a lie which makes us realize the truth

To understand a map, you need to know how maps are made, especially distorting aspects of the mapping process

Be careful not to confuse the mapped world with the real world

 

Why use maps?

 

Appreciation of maps leads to a better understanding of the world around you

 


Relevancy to GIS

 

Maps are made in GIS

Maps are common input of GIS

Maps are common output of GIS

Maps are important representation framework of GIS data

 


Review questions

 

1. What are defining characteristics of maps?

 

2. Compare and contrast

1) Mental maps versus Cartographic maps

2) Reference maps versus Thematic maps

 

3. Author says that representing surroundings with maps can be deceptive, in what sense?

 

What are advantages in using maps for understanding surroundings?

What are dangers in using maps for understanding surroundings?